New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newsapapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? would it be better if more good news was reported?

In society today, there are many manners to transfer the news to peopple. however, why editors decide to transmit these articles on TV, meanwhile others publicize them on newspapers. I am going to explain for these decisions. i would also like to clarify that more good news is not better than bad news, even it could lead to some damaging consequences.

 Firstly, compilers would mull over who want to transfer that amount of information. For example if the target  are adolescents, the number of those people watching television especially favourite channels for youths much more than those who read the news papers, as a result the effect of information transmission by television would be beter than by newspapers. Secondly, because of strong pervasion of information on media or newspapers, so new editors also certainly consider how that news affect the ideology of observers, bad news such as scandals of star singers, housebreakings not only attract curiousness of public opinion but direct lifestyle of many watchers following wrong ways. As a result of rising up unequalbility of society.

On the other hand, a big amount of unfavourable news are not publicized on broadcasts or newspapers, a big part of countries could not keep up with some up-to-date information which are happening  around them such as crimes, tense among different countries and so on. In these cases, people  could gain inadequate information to be proactive towards any changes. many businesses  could be collapsed caused by lack of information.

To sum up, breaking news is one of the crucial part in modern societies, personally, i think compilers should consider carefully, what they willl supply to people. Especially, unfavourable information needs to publicize faithfully, timerly.

Fixed version

New editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newsapapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? would it be better if more good news was reported?

In society today, there are many manners to transfer the news to peopple. however, why editors decide to transmit these articles on TV, meanwhile others publicize them on newspapers. I am going to explain for these decisions. i would also like to clarify that more good news is not better than bad news, even it could lead to some damaging consequences.

Firstly, compilers would mull over who would be the target of tranfering that amount of information. For example if the they are adolescents, the number of those people watching television especially favourite channels for youths are much more than those who read the news papers, as a result the effect of information transmission by television would be beter than by newspapers. Secondly, because of degree of information pervasion on media or newspapers is different, so editors would base on economization and profit to decide which is the most suitable, costly, and effective. It is a crucial factor that determines the development of them.

On the other hand, a big amount of unfavourable news is not publicized on broadcasts or newspapers, a big part of a country could not keep up with some up-to-date information which are happening around them such as crimes, tense between  countrieas among so on. In these cases, people could gain inadequate information to be proactive towards any macro and micro changes. many businesses could be collapsed caused by lack of information.

To sum up, breaking news is one of the crucial part in modern societies, personally, i think compilers should consider carefully, what they willl supply to people. Especially, unfavourable information needs publicizing faithfully, timerly.